6/17/18

Serial Eitan Variant Finished Assembly

MANTAK has just released a video showing the assembly of the 2nd prototype of the Eitan, and the first one in serial configuration. 
The first prototype has finished its testing series and now the next phase has begun. It was recently reported the Eitan has finished its mobility tests. 
As this is a production variant, it is likely the new turret and IronVision system will be tested on this prototype. 
Currently, it features a different engine than the first prototype, to test different options before production or possible replacements should one supplier become less attractive. Also features improved protection for the crew and many general improvements.
Delivery to frontline units should commence somewhere around 2021, which means full rate production begins late 2020.


 



Suspension was also improved



Showing the different armor sections. Blue is not necessarily homogenous in thickness.

Notice how far back the turret ring is.



Passive armor laid first before the reactive armor modules.


 Final side armor modules added, showing areas for filling with likely reactive armor inserts.

Testing new engine.




6/13/18

ERA - Next Big Step in Armor Technology?

We all know the deal. ERA was invented and put to use in the early 80's just in time for the 1982 Lebanon War, and it was pioneered by German scientist Manfred Held who started work on it as early as the mid to late 60's, developing it jointly with Israeli company RAFAEL for a final product dubbed "Blazer" in English, and "Baltan" in Hebrew.
Simultaneously, the USSR was developing their own ERA called Kontakt-1 which proved to be somewhat more effective than Held's and RAFAEL's Blazer. 

Back in the 80's it was considered revolutionary. It gave old tanks equipped only with steel armor a fighting chance against enemies equipped with ATGMs that would otherwise nullify the effectiveness of their steel armor.
Today, however, ERA is relegated to either beefing up areas that MBTs can't really up-armor (and even then many choose NERA/NxRA types of armor), or medium weight AFVs that don't really invest much of their weight into armor.

This new invention can bring back the glory days of ERA, if it picks up, and what's mind boggling about it is that it is such a simple and elegant solution that I really have no idea how none has thought of it yet.

IBD Deisenroth Engineering unveiled in this years EUROSATORY exhibition their newest member in their long line of protection systems - The SMART PROTech.


The concept is as follows:
The center piece contains pressure sensors that can pinpoint the impact location. 
Two launchers located above and below the impact point are activated upon impact, and fire over a wide area to defeat even tandem warheads that so far were the achilles heel of non-heavy ERA.
Fragments from the launchers will in theory impact an area large enough to ensure the entire missile is defeated, and because its passive activation does not enable it to pinpoint the main warhead's location as APS would.

Jane's also report that the SMART PROTech system can be optimized to defeat long rod penetrators, i.e APFSDS, which became a less prominent threat today than it was during the Cold War, but is nonetheless a crucial aspect to take into account as the new trend in proxy warfare is hybrid combat units, who are non-state-actors that possess state-actor weaponry, and may be organized in a quasi-military fashion. As such, the chances of armor on armor engagements grow by the day, many already happening in Ukraine and Syria for example.

It is important to note that only one launcher will activate at a time, meaning the SMART-PROTech system can defeat at least two threats impacting the same location, although unlike IBD's ADS which operates in a similar manner but uses active sensors and is classified as an APS, two blocks cannot overlap in their protective zones because the sensors are completely passive.


But it's not a problem. This system is not an APS, thus it is a whole lot cheaper than one, making it accessible to many potential users, while giving them an almost APS-like protection.

What is sure, is that while this system is currently overlooked, perhaps because of many other big innovations in Eurosatory 2018, it is a genuinely innovative idea that can probably easily outclass any kind of existing ERA.

One additional aspect worth noting, is that it can play well into the concept of layered APS.

As the area of air defense progressed all around the world, many countries looked into beefing up their air defense coverage not only by improving a certain air defense system, but by augmenting them with MORE systems, covering different sorts of ranges and altitudes, or even ones for similar ranges but with specialized flight and defeat characteristics to defeat different types of targets better.

The same will eventually happen to vehicle-borne APS, and countries will seek to develop different APS that have differing levels of complexity, range, and limited sets of targets to maximize a networked array's efficiency.

IBD's SMART PROTech system can definitely fit into the category of low end APS, having the lowest level of sophistication and complexity, but with great effect, allowing it to serve as a low tier APS, while longer range systems such as launcher-based ones, or laser-based, will take on the longer range threats.


Source:
http://www.janes.com/article/80769/smart-solution-against-tandem-warheads-es18d1

5/25/18

Namer and Eitan turret 3D cutaway

In the recent ground warfare conference in Israel, as I've told before, there was quite a poor coverage, and no photos apparently. But one was sent to a military forum admin nicknamed Sirpad, and he shared it with us. 


As we can see, it has everything a turret might need but I caught a few unconventional things, for the better and worse:
  • Commander seems to have an MWIR night sight with a recognition range of 5km on the main vision block (FLIR), while the gunner has an EMWIR sight with a somewhat longer range, neither of which however are mentioned specifically on Elbit's site. Their HDTV cameras are also different, probably the gunner also having a longer range, higher quality one.

  • There are 2 MATADOR anti-bunker/materiel/personnel short range rockets for up to several hundred meters, primarily for urban warfare scenarios where you may need a little more punch than a 30mm gun can provide. These are, of course, fully interchangeable with Spike LR 2 missiles.

  • The Trophy system does not seem to have an autoloading mechanism on this one. We know the IDF required, about a decade ago during trials of the Trophy against the Iron Fist, for both contenders to have 3 interceptors per side, for a total of 6. This meant the autoloader would accommodate either 3 munitions, or 2 with 1 already loaded. It would be quite ridiculous for it to only have 1 charge per side. 
We do not know yet if this was intentionally left out from this presentation, or a temporary design choice. But we can see that the mortar's autoloading mechanism was also omitted.





5/15/18

Israeli Ground Warfare Conference

As in every year, apparently, the IDF will be having completely ground-focused conferences and exhibitions around the middle of May. The first major one was last year in May 16-17th 2017. 
The topics are AFVs, artillery, firepower, intelligence, tactics, strategies, force structures, future threats, and more.
In this blog I love focusing on AFVs, and unfortunately, last year the roadmap for the short to long term development of AFVs has been mostly unveiled, so today we're not left with much. But it's still something so let's dissect it:

The future AFV will be tracked, not wheeled. It will be a sensor station with varied firepower. The capabilities in development will allow the AFVs to be operated by 2 men. A third man will be a frame commander (platoon or company commander), or an external systems operator. A tank platoon will include 2 vehicles. That's our direction.
The budget for the future MBT development is limited and it makes things difficult, but the development paths are innovative. The roadmap includes automation, autonomy, broadband communication, AI, and more. The vision for future combat maneuver includes a step in capabilities. The AFV will be the center of future ground maneuver, even in complex terrain.
The Carmel program develops technologies for the future AFVs, as MANTAK will draw technologies from it and give them to existing vehicles. The AFV will have to protect itself and its firepower has to be varied. The propulsion will by hybrid. The future AFV will also have cyber protection in accordance with international standards.
We started in 2015. In 2016 the Carmel program began and will end by Q3-Q4 of 2019. We are at the end of Phase 1 - Feasibility tests for an AFV operation via 2 men. After that, MANTAK will enter the picture. 3 industries are working on this - RAFAEL, Elbit, and IAI. Each one offers a different concept. RAFAEL offers a 'glass cockpit' where the situational picture is laid on screens. Elbit offers a pilots' helmet converted for ground use. And IAI combines different technologies. This is what we will see during the demonstration in 2019. High emphasis is put on situational awareness and lethality.

Most of that is information we already know. But we do get some confirmation that all Carmel vehicles will be manned by 3 crewmen. 2 are the actual crew, and the third is a commander or drone operator. Since we also now know there will be 2 vehicles per platoon, we can infer in one there will be the platoon commander and in another the drone or systems operator.
Maybe more next time.
 
 

4/22/18

Future Firepower of The IDF 2030

Udi Etzion, a respectable author, wrote an article to the daily Yediot Aharonot magazine, where he describes the technologies the IDF could incorporate by the year 2030, in some way or another.
Similar to the soon-to-be-established American Futures Command, the IDF has committees that plan for the coming years. The objectives for 2020 are advancing on schedule and now they are looking to what will be in the decade that follows.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Laser systems for the protection of ground forces, 2-man "Carmel" tanks, smart helmets for the infantry, drones for medevac, unmanned ammo trucks, and a data analyst for every brigade commander. The IDF is already recruiting the AI and operates more and more autonomous vehicles in the air, land, and sea. But even in 12 years the robots will not replace the combat soldiers and pilots. The army will march on its stomach, only the food will be printed on the field, in portable 3D printers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Even in 2018 it sounds like science fiction, surely in 1978. But this story did happen. 40 years ago RAFAEL had worked on a secret project to develop a laser weapon system for the Sa'ar-5 ships that the navy would later acquire. The project was frozen after it was realized just how much time and resources will be needed for its completion. Only in recent years the US Navy began fielding this system.

So when we start drawing up the plan for what the IDF will acquire by 2030, we have to take into account that not every promising technology matures in the pace that is expected of it, and sometimes the priorities change because of the changing reality in the region. Take for example the presence of Russian and Iranian forces in the north and the growing tensions in Syria that have already caused the re-writing of work plans for the coming years. But even under the limitations of censorship, this is a rare view into the plans and projects that will turn 82-year old IDF into something different than it was in its 70th.

After the revolution of precise weapons in the 90's, and the information revolution of the past decade, the IDF is now facing another revolution: Autonomous fighting. In 2030 we will have the capability to identify targets, classify them, adapt the right type of weapon to them, and give the order of fire.
Once, a ground force could be attacked, identify a target, and request fire on target, and wait 2 hours until it would receive it.
We are on our way to a reality where we will have the capability to employ quick and precise firepower when a man only supervises it. Of course, there is no substitute for a commander who sets the open fire policy depending on the circumstances.

Brig. General Avtalion says "We are dealing in reality. As the prime technologist of the ground forces in the IDF I can tell you that the leap that is happening in AI and processing power could allow these capabilities even earlier. We're talking about a smart network that will be connected to all types of recon, armament, and command centers. It will allow the use of autonomous vehicles and reduce the risk to the combat soldiers. We have a long way to go before we get there, but even today the IDF is a world leader in fielding autonomous capabilities".

Brig. General Avtalion is not the only technologist that believes these autonomous capabilities are achievable within a decade. "There are 3 revolutions that will aid this happen: The leap in AI capabilities, through neuron networks and other means, the ability to create and analyze vast amounts of data, what is called Big Data, and the decreasing cost of processing power", explains Colonel A, commander of Matzpen, the software development unit of the GHQ (General Head Quarters).
"AI could better identify the centers of gravity of the enemy and advise commanders where to attack. Even today we're using AI in the West Bank area. The big challenge becomes how to professionalize and use all the digital data that the system has in every sector. In the military, there are vast amounts of data and one has to know how to extract the relevant data. The brigade commanders of 2030 won't need only a driver and communications operator, but a data analyst as well. Just like there are data analysts in the capital market today."

The move will not be sweeping: Pilots, tank crews, sailors, will continue firing on their own and with their judgement. The Tzayad system (BMS), that is already operational, will be used not only for the control of ground forces but also the control of autonomous systems. For example on borders.", explains head of planning division of the ground forces, Colonel Rami Avudraham.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is no surprise this is primarily about the ground forces. The understanding that the IDF has for years neglected the ground forces for the sake of the air force and intelligence, was translated by Chief of Staff Gadi Eizenkot to an organized program for the upgrade of the ground forces. Actions that begin today will be completed within a decade and will make the ground forces more technologically advanced than it is today.

This way, for example, by then the program to re-equip the IDF with new howitzers will be completed. The new howitzers, developed by Elbit systems, will have higher rate of fire, less crewmen, more precise firepower, and automatic datalink to location systems (GPS), weather analysis and more.
The new systems will probably be mounted on special wheeled trucks and not on tracked platforms, contrary to the current howitzers.
The army by then will have hundreds of Eitan combat vehicles that will replace some of the M113 that should have been gone a while ago.
And as was reported here earlier, the IDF will set up a new rocket force subordinated to the GHQ, that will base itself on long range rockets up to a range of 300km or more.

The innovations won't stop here. For years the IDF has dragged its feet in the procurement of defense systems. The Army resisted systems like Arrow and Iron Dome, and only started equipping its advanced Merkava 4 tanks with the Trophy APS after the 2nd Lebanon War. 
Today, after they have all proven themselves, they changed approach.

In recent months a new project was initiated to develop a protection system for the ground troops, that will accompany them on the battlefield and enter service in the next decade. "We want to provide the maneuvering troops a protection system against mortars, short range rockets, and drones", explains Colonel Avudraham.
"The system will be based on a laser (Iron Beam), and on kinetic interceptors as well, a product that doesn't exist yet anywhere in the world".
Drones, activated in packs, pose a double threat: They allow terrorists to conduct surveillance and espionage on IDF troops, a capability that once only state actors possessed, and gives them the ability to strike from the air via release of grenades, or "suicide" of HE-carrying drones.

On the other hand, the IDF is set to bolster the aerial capabilities of its ground troops. Elbit's new "Skylark 2" drone, that has already assimilated in the infantry brigades and can provide commanders with 6 hours of continuous footage, will soon be joined by new UAVs, that will reduce the dependence on the air force.
We're talking about armed drones and kamikaze drones, sort of single-use UAVs that can loiter for a very long time before locating a target and detonating on it. If they won't find a target, they can be safely retrieved, refueled, and reused.

By 2030 we'll also take in new advanced drones that will assume a new niche: Communications. To permit all autonomous capabilities, the ground forces will need access to intelligence systems and communications to receive new orders. The new communications array will ensure a steady stream of up-to-date data from the front to the commands and vice versa.
However, the ability to conduct operations independently will be preserved.

Until then, the IDF will be equipped with a significant amount of Merkava 4 Barack tanks, the improved model that will enter serial production in 2020, and will include improvements to its protection, but mostly to identification of targets and their handling whilst connected to an army-wide network.

On the other hand, by 2030 the new vehicles that will replace the Merkava on the production line should mature as well: The "Carmel", an advanced tank that will be operated by 2 men only instead of 4, as well as a family of vehicles based on it.
The real question is whether the conservative IDF will be able to take the dramatic choice to end the production of the classical tank and move on to the 21st century.

Overall, after many years of conservatism and sticking to treads, we could see in the IDF more and more wheeled AFVs. The Eitan IFVs will be joined by smaller, lighter vehicles adapted to fighting in urban areas. It will allow more fighters to mobilize with proper protection. With that in mind, it is clear that by 2030 the IDF will not be able to replace the M113 entirely, such as the one that blew up in Shujaiya in Operation Protective Edge, and many of them will remain in service. But they will only serve as 2nd line vehicles, not to be used by those units who will spearhead the fight.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Sa'ar 6 ships are set to arrive in Israel soon, and by the start of the next decade (20's) they will enter service after being refitted with indigenous systems. They will be used to protect the offshore gas rigs.
These ships will be among the most well armed in the world: Barak 8 missiles of the IAI against super-sonic Yakhont missiles held by Syria and Hezbollah, a naval version of the Iron Dome against rockets aimed at the gas rigs, and a new offensive weapon, Israeli as well.

We are also testing the possibility of arming these ships with long range rockets. These are a naval version of IMI's long range rockets for several hundred kilometers, that will serve as a basis for the IDF's new rocket corps. The Iron Dome didn't need any significant changes to become adapted to naval platforms. If that will be the case for IMI's rockets, and there won't be a need in significant investment in their modification, then they'll make it to the navy.

The navy will also accept by 2030 at least one submarine out of the 3 on order. Although they're built by the same shipyard that built the Dolphin 1 and Dolphin 2 class submarines, they will be different.
In recent years, low frequency sonars are entering the world of submarines, with improved active detection capabilities. There is wider use of radars as well, and satellite identification of submarines has also become available. The answer to these threats is a new design of the body of the submarine, to be 'stealthier' to these means.

The navy plans to complete by 2030 the replacement of the Sa'ar 4.5 ships of the "Nirit" class. Now that the submarine and surface ship corruption case has blown up, the IDF will return to buying its ships at home. That is, build the new surface ships, call them "Sa'ar 7" if you like, in Israel Shipyards facilities in Haifa, that also built the Sa'ar 4.5 ships.
The IDF needs new heavier ships to replace the Sa'ar 4.5 that will increase in weight from 500 tons to 900 tons. A proper candidate could be the "Sa'ar 72" which are redesigned Sa'ar 4.5 ships. The Sa'ar 5 weighing 1,200 tons will be replaced by 2,000 ton Sa'ar 6 ships.

The navy will also try to convince decision makers at the GHQ to increase the number of ships in light of the new presence of not-so-friendly navies in the Mediterranean, such as the Russian fleet. In 2030 the Sa'ar 5 will be the backbone of the fleet, almost 40 years in age, and they will also need either refurbishment and modernization, or replacement.

Article: Here.

4/13/18

Eitan completes series of mobility tests

Due to enter service by the end of 2020 if not sooner, the Eitan is quickly getting closer and closer to completion of its development phase, with recently reaching a milestone of rigorous mobility tests.
Tests included driving in all of Israel's types of terrain from the wet and muddy north, to the hot deserts of the south.
The next major milestones of its development will include integration of a turret with an APS, as well as operational tests in exercises with the Nahal infantry brigade that is set to absorb them first.
The turret is developed jointly for the Namer and Eitan, and at least one prototype was integrated and tested on the Namer. Due to systems commonality between the Namer and Eitan, the development of the turret and testing on both will accelerate the process for the Eitan. 
Nahal brigade has already started testing the prototype as well a while ago, and may soon implement them into wider exercises as more prototypes are built for that purpose.



It is worth noting that another major component of the Eitan - The Iron Vision Head Mounted Display that provides an Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) view, enabling looking through the vehicle and laying important information on the display wherever the operator is looking, has been tested already last year on the Merkava 4 both in its methods of operation and its technical capabilities. 
Thus, the Eitan is in very advanced stages of its development.

4/4/18

Barak MBT update

I don't really know why it was always marked as a draft and never published, but I think it's still relevant even though it's from November last year (2017):

A new article from "Ynet News" adds new info on the Barak and other programs.
Just a reminder, Barak is an upgraded Merkava 4M. 

It's in Hebrew, but I have taken upon myself to translate the important bits here (some new, some old, I will mark it):

1)The Barak weighs 70 tons. (new)

Ex: In Israel, exact figures are almost never given. It's not because it's OPSEC, but because that's the sort of mentality here. Only the engineers will handle that, and the plebs get rounded numbers. So it could mean about 69, or it could be 73. 
However up until now it's always been 60-65 tons, so we could see some solid amount of equipment added to the tank, which will be interesting. On the downside, it means weight reduction measures probably weren't taken and I shouldn't explain why excessive weight is bad.

2)Utilizes an AI-managed "mission computer". (new/old)

Ex: Okay so we've heard plenty of times that many actions will be automated, and that means AI. It was said however mostly in the context of the firing loop. Now they say the mission computer, otherwise known as BMS, will automatically manage certain comms with other assets that will also include the Namers and Eitans among others. Info that was previously manually input by the TC (commander). 
The AI will be able to make various decisions based on the targets it identifies, whether based on the optics or the APS, and advise the crew on certain actions, and make terrain-mapping related decisions such as pointing optimal firing positions or dangerous areas.

3)Female voice selected to alert crews via BMS. (new)

Ex: Easy to distinguish from a male voice, so it won't blend in with the crew's voices, and the crew will not ignore it (they tend to ignore messages from crewmen). Among the alerts it will give are "Missiles", "Short range ATGM", and "Turning over" which means it will not only alert the crew of the type of threat and thus approximate time to impact, but also of terrain related issues to minimize accidents.

4)It was tested as a fully autonomous vehicle. (new)

Ex: But there is no operational requirement, for obvious reasons, so it's merely a test. 

5)Hybrid powerplant. (new)

Ex: To cope with the higher weight and to save on fuel, hybrid is the way to go. This could also give it an amazing torque and make it a "little" speed demon. And as an environmentalist it really gives me some relief.

6)IronVision helmet system tested last month (October). (old)

Ex: I thought it was scheduled to be tested in April, but nonetheless it's good news it happened. The date for operational fielding has remained unchanged, and even rounded down to 2020, so there's no delay but a re-scheduling. 

7)IronVision to be tested soon on Company-sized force. (new)

Ex: Means less time required for full operational testing, if they segment the operational testing phases to do in parallel with the program.

8)Starting next year, 3 times as many Trophy-equipped vehicles will be manufactured as this year. (new)

Ex: While the production rate is still minimal, to keep the work stable and allow to double the output when needed urgently, the front-line units will benefit greatly and at a quick rate from this decision. It also comes in light of the recent contract for 1,000 Trophy systems, and the decision to not only equip the Namers and Eitans with it, but also the Merkava 3.